Disciplinary Counsel v. Pavlik
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 89 Ohio St.3d 458.] OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. PAVLIK. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Pavlik,
2000-Ohio-219.] Attorneys at law—Misconduct—Public reprimand—Engaging out-of-state attorney and failing to disclose attorney’s limited authority in Ohio to clients. (No. 00-400—Submitted May 9, 2000—Decided August 16, 2000.) ON CERTIFIED REPORT by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court, No. 99-45. __________________ {¶ 1} The parties stipulated to the following facts concerning the disciplinary…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. MischOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Disciplinary Counsel v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Fehler-SchultzOhio Supreme Court · 1992
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Disciplinary Counsel v. WillisOhio Supreme Court · 2002