Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Pavlik

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 2000No. 2000-0400PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 89 Ohio St.3d 458.] OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. PAVLIK. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Pavlik,

2000-Ohio-219.] Attorneys at law—Misconduct—Public reprimand—Engaging out-of-state attorney and failing to disclose attorney’s limited authority in Ohio to clients. (No. 00-400—Submitted May 9, 2000—Decided August 16, 2000.) ON CERTIFIED REPORT by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court, No. 99-45. __________________ {¶ 1} The parties stipulated to the following facts concerning the disciplinary…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  2. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. MischOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Fehler-SchultzOhio Supreme Court · 1992

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. WillisOhio Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API