Legal Opinion

Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Misch

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1998No. 97-2501PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Per curiam

“No person shall be permitted to practice as an attorney and counselor at law * * * unless he has been admitted to the bar by order of the *259supreme court in compliance with its prescribed and published rules.” R.C. 4705.01. Rendering legal services for another in Ohio by a person not admitted to practice in Ohio is the unauthorized practice of law. Gov.Bar R. VH(2)(A).

Admission to the bar of Ohio may be accomplished through examination under Gov.Bar R. 1(1-7) or, if the applicant has been admitted as an attorney in the highest court of another state or the District of Columbia, without…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Land Title Abstract & Trust Co. v. DworkenOhio Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Royal Indemnity Co. v. J. C. Penney Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Akron Bar Ass'n v. MillerOhio Supreme Court · 1997

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. KafeleOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. TelfordOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. MooreOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  4. NASCAR Holdings, Inc. v. Testa (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. CaseyOhio Supreme Court · 2013

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API