Legal Opinion

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Fehler-Schultz

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 2, 1992No. 92-417PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

We have thoroughly reviewed the record and agree with the board’s findings of fact and conclusions of law. We also agree with the board’s recommendation and are not persuaded by respondent’s objections thereto. Thus, we order that respondent be indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio, consistent with the board’s recommendation. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. CromwellOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. PavlikOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. CromwellOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Columbus Bar Assn. v. CulbreathOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. SchwartzOhio Supreme Court · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API