Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Fehler-Schultz
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
We have thoroughly reviewed the record and agree with the board’s findings of fact and conclusions of law. We also agree with the board’s recommendation and are not persuaded by respondent’s objections thereto. Thus, we order that respondent be indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio, consistent with the board’s recommendation. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.
2Cited by11 opinions
- Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. CromwellOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. PavlikOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. CromwellOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Columbus Bar Assn. v. CulbreathOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. SchwartzOhio Supreme Court · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.