In Re Charles H. Kroekel and Frederick A. Pfaff
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MARKEY, Chief Judge.
Kroekel and Pfaff (Kroekel) appeal from a decision of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (board), affirming the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1, 3-12, 14-22, 24-40, 42, and 43 in application Serial No. 770,085 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(g) and interference estoppel. 230 USPQ 191 (1985). We affirm the rejection on the grounds of interference estoppel.
Background
On October 23, 1968, Kroekel filed an application, assigned to Rohm and Haas Company, entitled “Unsaturated Polymer Resin Molding Compositions”. One of our…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- In Re Leonard Kaplan and Wellington Epler WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Application of Klaus Heinz Risse, Ulrich Horlein and Wolfgang Wirth. Application of Ulrich Horlein, Wolfgang Wirth and Klaus Heinz RisseCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
- Leslie C. Case v. Cpc International, Inc., and Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks, Co-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Squires v. CorbettCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
- In Re LongCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1936
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re Harry C. DecklerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Procter & Gamble Co. v. Nabisco Brands, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1989
- In Re Michihiko Ochiai, Taiiti Okada, Osami Aki, Akira Morimoto, Kenji Kawakita, and Yoshihiro MatsushitaCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Bailey v. Dart Container Corp. of Mich.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1997
- Exxon Corporation (Now Known as Exxonmobil Corporation) and Exxon Chemical Patents, Inc. v. Phillips Petroleum Company, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.