Legal Opinion
Fitzgerald v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided September 20, 1977No. Civ A. 75-1598-SPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SKINNER, District Judge.
The roller coaster career of this case has taken another and I believe final turn. This is an action under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, 29 U.S.C. § 621-634. All of the proceedings have been on the defendant’s motion for summary judgment based upon the plaintiff’s failure to comply with the applicable statute of limitations. The history of the litigation is as follows:
On July 12, 1976, I ruled that the plaintiff was obliged to apply for relief under state law as prerequisite to this action, Goger v. H. K. Porter Company, Inc.,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Virginia L. GOGER, Appellant, v. H. K. PORTER COMPANY, INC., AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- Bertram M. HADFIELD, Plaintiff, Appellee, v. the MITRE CORP. and Haig H. Hedison, Defendants, AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977
- Fitzgerald v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1976
- Lugo Garces v. Sagner International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
- Hadfield v. Mitre CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1976
3Cited by6 opinions
- Holliday v. Ketchum, MacLeod & Grove, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- Evans v. Oscar Mayer & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
- Fitzgerald v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1978
- Hadfield v. Mitre Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1978
- 17 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1175, 17 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 8441 James R. Holliday v. Ketchum, MacLeod & Grove, Inc., a Corporation, Edward T. Parrack, William H. Genge, Charles E. McHugh and James E. FullerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.