Legal Opinion

Hadfield v. Mitre Corporation

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided November 4, 1976No. Civ. A. 74-2946-SPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

SKINNER, District Judge.

This is an action under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. § 621, et seq. (ADEA). The defendants have moved to dismiss on the ground that the plaintiff did not make a proper application to the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination, asserting that such an application was required under 29 U.S.C. § 633(b). Such an application was only required if at the critical date Massachusetts was a “deferral state” as defined by the Court of Appeals of the First Circuit in Garces v. Sagner International,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Johnson v. Commissioner of Public SafetyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fitzgerald v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1977
  2. Currington v. Polaroid Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1978
  3. Fitzgerald v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API