Hadfield v. Mitre Corp.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS
SKINNER, District Judge.
This case was remanded to this court after a determination by the Court of Appeals that Massachusetts is a deferral state, as defined by 29 U.S.C. § 633(b). The hearing that was interrupted pending the interlocutory appeal in the case was thereafter resumed. I make the following findings of fact.
1. The plaintiff did not file an application with the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination (MCAD) before commencing this action.
2. His failure to do so was not the result of official misinformation.
3. Plaintiff gave a timely…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Lorillard v. PonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Love v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. PriceSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. Southwestern Cable Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Charles D. REICH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DOW BADISCHE COMPANY and Dow Chemical Company, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- National Cash Register v. RinerSuperior Court of Delaware · 1979
- Fitzgerald v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1978