Legal Opinion
Fitzgerald v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided July 12, 1976No. Civ. A. 75-1598-SPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
SKINNER, District Judge.
In this action under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634 (“ADEA”), the defendant has moved for summary judgment on two grounds:(1) The plaintiff is barred by the applicable statute of limitations.(2) The plaintiff’s deposition and the affidavits of defendant’s supervisor conclusively establish that plaintiff cannot prevail on the merits.
As to the second ground, the issue on the merits is one of the primary motivation of defendant’s supervisor in demoting the plaintiff.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Virginia L. GOGER, Appellant, v. H. K. PORTER COMPANY, INC., AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- Lena Robinson v. Diamond Housing CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- Skoglund v. Singer CompanyDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1975
- Adolfo Campos v. Puerto Rico Sun Oil Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
- Vazquez v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1975
3Cited by11 opinions
- Bertram M. HADFIELD, Plaintiff, Appellee, v. the MITRE CORP. and Haig H. Hedison, Defendants, AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977
- Clement GABRIELE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHRYSLER CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
- Holliday v. Ketchum, MacLeod & Grove, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- Evans v. Oscar Mayer & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
- Fitzgerald v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.