Legal Opinion
Bertram M. HADFIELD, Plaintiff, Appellee, v. the MITRE CORP. and Haig H. Hedison, Defendants, Appellants
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided September 1, 1977No. 77-1034PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEVIN H. CAMPBELL, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-appellee Hadfield sued the Mitre Corporation under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 et seq., claiming that his discharge at age 63 was based on age discrimination. In Hadfield’s amended complaint, he asserted that he had brought this alleged discrimination to the attention of the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination (MCAD), see Mass.Gen.Laws, c. 151B, via two telephone calls. Mitre moved to dismiss on grounds that the court lacked jurisdiction by reason of Hadfield’s failure to comply with 29 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Love v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Halliday v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Mrs. Roger McMillan REEB, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY ATLANTA, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Rogers v. Exxon Research & Engineering Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Virginia L. GOGER, Appellant, v. H. K. PORTER COMPANY, INC., AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Carl Kale v. Combined Insurance Company of America, Carl Kale v. Combined Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Tinsley v. First Union National BankCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
- Charles D. REICH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DOW BADISCHE COMPANY and Dow Chemical Company, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Lewis v. Area II Homecare for Senior Citizens, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
- Abbott v. Moore Business Forms, Inc.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1977
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.