Legal Opinion

France Telecom S.A. v. Marvell Semiconductor Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided April 14, 2014No. Case No. 12-cv-04967-WHOPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON MARVELL’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Re: Dkt. No. 137

WILLIAM H. ORRICK, United States District Judge

Defendant Marvell Semiconductor, Inc. (“Marvell”), moves for summary judgment that U.S. Patent 5,446,747 (“the '747 Patent”) is invalid because Claims 1 and 10 are merely mathematical algorithms or abstract ideas, and are not transformative or limited applications of those algorithms or ideas, and therefore fail to claim patent-eligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101. Marvell also seeks partial summary judgment on the issue of whether it is liable to plaintiff France Telecom S.A.…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
  4. Bilski v. KapposSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United States Plywood Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. California Institute of Technology v. Hughes Communications Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2014
  2. Ziptronix, Inc. v. OmniVision Technologies, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
  3. Ameritox, Ltd. v. Millennium Health, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2015
  4. Evolved Wireless, LLC v. Apple Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API