France Telecom S.A. v. Marvell Semiconductor Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MARVELL’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Re: Dkt. No. 137
WILLIAM H. ORRICK, United States District Judge
Defendant Marvell Semiconductor, Inc. (“Marvell”), moves for summary judgment that U.S. Patent 5,446,747 (“the '747 Patent”) is invalid because Claims 1 and 10 are merely mathematical algorithms or abstract ideas, and are not transformative or limited applications of those algorithms or ideas, and therefore fail to claim patent-eligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101. Marvell also seeks partial summary judgment on the issue of whether it is liable to plaintiff France Telecom S.A.…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Bilski v. KapposSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United States Plywood Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- California Institute of Technology v. Hughes Communications Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2014
- Ziptronix, Inc. v. OmniVision Technologies, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Ameritox, Ltd. v. Millennium Health, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2015
- Evolved Wireless, LLC v. Apple Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2016