Legal Opinion
Ameritox, Ltd. v. Millennium Health, LLC
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
Decided February 19, 2015No. 13-cv-832-wmcPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
WILLIAM M. CONLEY, District Judge.
This patent dispute presents a question of first impression with respect to the subject matter eligibility of a urine or other biological sample for drug screening and compliance protocols under 35 U.S.C. § 101, as well as related issues of enablement under § 112. The analysis is made more challenging by the state of flux in the treatment of competing goals inherent in § 101 challenges in recent years, and even in recent months. See Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc., *889— U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 1289, 182 L.Ed.2d 321 (2012);…
2Cases cited71 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Exergen Corp. v. Brooklands Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015
- Procter & Gamble Co. v. QuantifiCare Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2017
- Celsis In Vitro, Inc. v. Cellzdirect, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
- SkillSurvey, Inc. v. Checkster LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- Innovaport LLC v. Target CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2024