Legal Opinion

Donegal Township School District v. Crosby

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 24, 1955No. Appeal, No. 94PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Woodside, J.,

This is an appeal from judgment non obstante veredicto in favor of the plaintiff after verdict for the defendant in an action of ejectment. It involves title to a plot of ground formerly used for school purposes.

There is no serious dispute over the following facts: In 1884 John Pontius was the owner of a 195 acre farm in Donegal Township, Butler County. By a will, *32dated July 22, 1884 and probated as his last will and testament shortly after his death on January 22, 1892, he devised to his son, George Pontius, 85 acres of his farm upon condition that George would pay…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Foulk v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1834
  2. Garrett v. JacksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1853
  3. Lazarus v. MorrisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
  4. Townsend v. BoydSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  5. Ontelaunee Orchards, Inc. v. RothermelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Morning Call, Inc. v. Bell Atlantic-Pennsylvania, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Baugh v. GrigsbySupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  3. Barter v. Palmerton Area School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. City of Marietta v. GloverSupreme Court of Georgia · 1969
  5. Buckingham Township School District v. Large, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API