Legal Opinion

Barter v. Palmerton Area School District

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 24, 1990No. 598PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

In this action to recover a deposit made pursuant to the terms of a contract for the sale of real estate, the trial court determined that the seller’s title was unmarketable as a matter of law and entered summary judgment in favor of the buyer for the deposit which he had made. After careful review, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

Peter Barter is the assignee of Frank J. Horwith, who purchased at public sale, on October 1, 1988, the Delaware School Property on Delaware Avenue in Palmerton, Carbon County. The written agreement contained a provision that if the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. LaCourse v. KieselSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. Irving v. . CampbellNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  3. Ontelaunee Orchards, Inc. v. RothermelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. Medusa Portland Cement Co. v. LamantinaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  5. Donegal Township School District v. CrosbySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Scott v. TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  2. HAGUE v. FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
  3. HAGUE v. FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
  4. Scott v. TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API