Legal Opinion

Ontelaunee Orchards, Inc. v. Rothermel

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 13, 1939No. Appeal, 182PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Cunningham, J.,

The material facts in this action of ejectment are not in dispute and may be summarized as follows:

Jacob Stoudt, the common source of title, died in 1853 seized of a tract of land containing over three hundred acres, including the twenty-five perches here in dispute, located in Bern Township, Berks County. By his will he devised the entire tract to his son, John Stoudt. Our Supreme Court in Urich et ux. v. Merkel, 2 W. N. C. 550, (1876), and Urich’s Appeal, Stoudt’s Estate, 86 Pa. 386, (1878), held that, although the devise was to John Stoudt and his heirs, other…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Johns v. JohnsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  2. Lazarus v. MorrisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
  3. Irwin v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  4. Carter v. Ridge Turnpike Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  5. Cadwalader v. AppSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1876

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Yuscavage v. HamlinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  2. Martinez v. MundyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Quarles v. ArthurCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1950
  4. Davidson v. VaughnSupreme Court of Vermont · 1945
  5. Wilson EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API