Legal Opinion

Authentic Furniture Products, Inc. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 15, 1973No. 5518, C.A.D. 1109PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MaRket, Ohief Judge.

This appeal is from the decision, and judgment of the United States Customs Court, First Division, 68 Cust. Ct. 204, 343 F. Supp. 1372, C.D. 4362 (1972) overruling appellant’s protest to the classification of imported pieces of wooden bunk beds as parts of furniture under TSUS item 727.40, as modified. Appellant, relying on General Interpretative Pule 10(h),1 claims the proper classification to be as furniture other than chairs under item 727.35, as modified.

The merchandise consists of wooden-headboards, footboards, posts, ladders and guardrails in unassembled condition.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Authentic Furniture Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
  2. Finn Bros. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
  3. Hurricane Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  4. Protest 30432-K of Abercrombie & Fitch Co.United States Customs Court · 1943

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
  2. Daisy-Heddon v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
  3. Karoware, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1976
  4. Channel Master, Div. of Avnet Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
  5. Swift Instruments, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1982

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API