Legal Opinion
Daisy-Heddon v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided June 21, 1979No. 79-5PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Rich, Judge.
This appeal is from the judgment of the United States Customs Court, 81 Cust. Ct. 55, C.D. 4765, 460 F. Supp. 680 (1978), dismissing the importer’s action challenging the classification of imported merchandise as fishing reels under item 731.20 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States (TSUS) as modified by T.D. 68-9, rather than as parts of fishing reels under TSUS item 731.26 as modified by T.D. 68-9. We affirm.
Five different articles are involved. They are described variously on exporter’s invoices as “Heddon closed face reels,” “fishing reel parts” and “Heddon fly reels,”…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Authentic Furniture Products, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
- Authentic Furniture Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
- United States v. A. Johnson & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1978
- Daisy-Heddon v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1978
3Cited by30 opinions
- Simod America Corp. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
- Casio, Inc., Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Intel Singapore, Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Channel Master, Div. Of Avnet, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.