Legal Opinion

Karoware, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided December 23, 1976No. C.D. 4681PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RE, Judge:

The question presented in these four cases, consolidated for the purposes of trial, pertains to the proper classification, for cus toms duty purposes, of certain merchandise exported from Japan during 1968, 1969 and 1970. The merchandise consists of wine racks, and different types of wooden bars, imported together with glassware, and some with bar tools.

The various articles, invoiced as wine racks, keg bars, castle bars, tavern bars, executive roll top desk bars, small keg bars, treasure chest bars, cube bars, wine barrel bars, and bookshelf bars, were classified by the customs…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Herbert G. Schwarz, Dba Ski Imports v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
  2. Authentic Furniture Products, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
  3. Tanross Supply Co., Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
  4. Authentic Furniture Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
  5. Morris Friedman & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Karoware, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
  2. Porter v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1979
  3. Abbey Rents v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1977
  4. United States v. PorterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
  5. KMW Johnson, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API