Legal Opinion

Swift Instruments, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided August 23, 1982No. Court 74-11-03087PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATSON, Judge:

This action, tried before Judge Scovel Richardson, challenges the denial of a protest against the classification of certain merchandise as “unfinished compound optical microscopes” under TSUS items 708.71, 708.72 and 708.73 (TSUS items 708.71-73). 1 The merchandise can be roughly described as having the appearance of microscopes without lenses. In classifying the merchandise, defendant utilized General Interpretative Rule 10(h) of the General Headnotes to the Tariff Schedules, which provides that unless the context requires otherwise, a tariff description for an article covers…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Daisy-Heddon v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
  2. Authentic Furniture Products, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
  3. Authentic Furniture Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
  4. The United States v. J. Gerber & Co., Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
  5. J. Gerber & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
  2. Channel Master, Div. Of Avnet, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  3. Channel Master, Div. of Avnet Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
  4. Simod America Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
  5. Peterson Electro Musical Products v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API