Legal Opinion

State v. Board of County Commissioners

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 30, 1985No. 85-397PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

The principles of law which are applicable to the case in controversy have been previously set forth by this court on numerous occasions. The underlying rationale gleaned from our past decisions is, quite simply, to secure the preservation of judicial autonomy. As this court recently stated in State, ex rel. Arbaugh, v. Richland Cty. Bd. of Commrs. (1984), 14 Ohio St. 3d 5, at 6, “[w]e recognize that the power to control what a court spends, or to totally regulate the process of obtaining funds, ultimately becomes the power to control what the court does. Such a principle is an anathema to an…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Johnston v. TaulbeeOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State ex rel. Foster v. WittenbergOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  3. State ex rel. Durkin v. City Council of YoungstownOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State ex rel. Giuliani v. PerkOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  5. State ex rel. Arbaugh v. Richland County Board of CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Wilke v. Hamilton County Board of CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State ex rel. Morley v. LordiOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State ex rel. Maloney v. SherlockOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State ex rel. Donaldson v. AlfredOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State ex rel. Avellone v. Board of County CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1989

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API