State ex rel. Durkin v. City Council of Youngstown
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJ. P. Celebrezze, J.
We initially note that this appeal is not concerned with the amount of salary to be paid to the appellee herself as that figure is fixed by statute and is not subject to the discretion of either appellee or council.1 Rather, the controversy centers around the amount of salary to be paid the deputy clerks.
R.C. 1901.31(H) provides for the compensation of deputy clerks as follows:
“Deputy clerks may be appointed by the clerk and shall receive the compensation, payable in semimonthly installments out of the city treasury, that the clerk may prescribe * * *.” (Emphasis added.)
Based upon this…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State ex rel. Cleveland Municipal Court v. Cleveland City CouncilOhio Supreme Court · 1973
- State ex rel. Johnston v. TaulbeeOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- State ex rel. Foster v. WittenbergOhio Supreme Court · 1968
- State ex rel. Pomeroy v. WebberOhio Supreme Court · 1965
- State Ex Rel. Motter v. AtkinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1945
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State ex rel. Hillyer v. Tuscarawas Cty. Bd. of Commrs.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Donaldson v. AlfredOhio Supreme Court · 1993
- State ex rel. Arbaugh v. Richland County Board of CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. Board of County CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1985
- State ex rel. Avellone v. Board of County CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1989
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.