Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Morley v. Lordi

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 1995No. 95-128PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Per curiam

This cause presents two issues for our review: (1) Is mandamus available to compel appropriations to fund probate court expenses? and (2) Should the motion for summary judgment be granted? For the reasons that follow, we hold that a writ of mandamus may issue to compel the reasonable and necessary expenses of the courts of common pleas and their divisions, that the record contains no evidence to suggest that relator abused his discretion in determining the reasonable and necessary expenses of the probate court, and, therefore, that relator is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Mitseff v. WheelerOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Murphy v. City of ReynoldsburgOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Wing v. Anchor Media, Ltd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Welco Industries, Inc. v. Applied CompaniesOhio Supreme Court · 1993

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Zimmerman v. TompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. David M. Mumford v. David A. BasinskiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  3. State ex rel. Zimmerman v. TompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State ex rel. Wilke v. Hamilton County Board of CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State ex rel. Maloney v. SherlockOhio Supreme Court · 2003

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API