Legal Opinion

Vierra v. Fifth Avenue Rental Service

California Supreme Court

Decided August 6, 1963No. S. F. No. 21286PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.

The basic question involved in this case is whether the trial court was justified, under the facts, in instructing on the doctrine of assumption of risk. We have concluded that it was error, serious and prejudicial, and therefore reversible, to have instructed on this doctrine.

Plaintiff Vierra operates a bar and restaurant in a building leased from defendant Berkley. Berkley operated the tools that caused the injury to plaintiff. Defendant Fifth Avenue Rental Service was the renter of the tools involved in the accident.

I At the time the lease for the bar and restaurant was entered into,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Finnegan v. Royal Realty Co.California Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Prescott v. Ralphs Grocery Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Hayes v. Richfield Oil Corp.California Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Shahinian v. McCormickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Hawk v. City of Newport BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. Knight v. JewettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. General Electric Company v. BushNevada Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Luque v. McLeanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Ewing v. Cloverleaf BowlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Gyerman v. United States Lines Co.California Supreme Court · 1972

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API