Legal Opinion
Bailey v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 16, 2011No. Civil Action No. 2009-1027PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JAMES E. BOASBERG, District Judge.
Plaintiff Mary Bailey is a white female employed by Defendant Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority who suffers from an anxiety disorder. Her initial suit against WMATA included claims of race, age, and disability discrimination. As her causes of action under the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act have since been dismissed, her remaining claims are twofold. First, she alleges Defendant discriminated against her because of her race and disability when it declined to offer her a promotion.…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Kelly v. New York State Office of Mental HealthDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2016
- Alford v. Defense Intelligence AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
- St. John v. NapolitanoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Vaughan v. AmtrakDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- McNair v. Government of the District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.