Legal Opinion
Vaughan v. Amtrak
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 21, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2010-2184PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
AMY BERMAN JACKSON, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on plaintiffs partial motions for summary judgment [Dkt. # 30, 42] and defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment [Dkt. # 35]. For the reasons discussed below, the Court will deny plaintiffs motions for summary judgment and grant defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment.
I. BACKGROUND
In September 2008, plaintiff, a white male born in 1950, applied but was not selected for the position of Lead Service Attendant (“LSA”) with the National Railroad Passenger Corporation (“Amtrak”). See Compl. ¶¶ 3-4.…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Von Drasek v. BurwellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Rothe Development, Inc. v. Department of DefenseDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Gordon v. Office of the Architect of the CapitolDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Maniilaq Association v. SebeliusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- District No. 1, Pacific Coast District, Marine Engineers' Beneficial Association, Afl-Cio v. Liberty Maritime CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.