Legal Opinion
St. John v. Napolitano
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 5, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2010-0216PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BERYL A. HOWELL, United States District Judge
The plaintiff, Samuel St. John, filed this employment discrimination action when his superiors decided against promoting him from Acting Director to Permanent Director after observing him for one year functioning in the Acting role. The plaintiff alleges the defendant’s decision not to promote him was discriminatory and retaliatory under Title VTI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq., and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. § 633a, et seq. Second Am. Compl. (“SAC”), ¶¶1, 7, ECF No. 38. The…
2Cases cited66 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Elliott v. AcostaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Pintro v. GenachowskiDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- St. John v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- Balkan Energy Limited v. Republic of GhanaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- Coleman v. NapolitanoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.