Legal Opinion

United States v. Dent, Allcroft & Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 30, 1928No. 3013PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraham, Presiding Judge

The appellee imported a shipment of gloves in cases. Case No. 600 was examined by the discharging inspector and he noted, on a slip attached to the entry, that this case contained 3^- dozen pairs of gloves less than the invoiced amount. „On request of the importer, this case was sent to the public stores for examination. The appraiser duly reported to the collector that he found the case to be 13dozen pairs short. Thereupon the collector liquidated the entry, allowing 1o importer a shortage of 3-^ dozen pairs only. The importer protested, insisting it should be allowed a shortage as reported…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. ShallusCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  2. United States v. LippmannCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922
  3. Maderia Embroidery Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
  4. Mills & Gibb Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  5. Hamrah Bros. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gimbel Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
  2. Protest 933618-G of Steinberger Bros. Glove Corp.United States Customs Court · 1939
  3. Protest 949680-G of Meadows Wye & Co.United States Customs Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API