Legal Opinion

Maderia Embroidery Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 15, 1919No. 1964PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 42801. [Oral argument Mar. 27, 1919, by Mr. Lane and Mr. Hanson.)

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, Presiding Judge

Section 2921 of the Revised Statutes reads:

If, on the opening of any package, a deficiency of any article shall be found, on examination by the appraisers, the same shall be certified to the collector on the invoice, and an allowance for the same be made in estimating the duties.

The appellants imported various cases of goods packed in boxes. On entry, the appraiser on August 21, 1917, in compliance with the statute quoted above, made a notation on the invoice reading, “Short as noted,” and opposite case 949, invoiced to contain a variety of articles, all were grouped and marked short. This…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Morrill v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. United States v. ShallusCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  3. United States v. BrownCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  4. United States v. BrownCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  5. Balfour v. SullivanUnited States Circuit Court · 1883

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. LippmannCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922
  2. Hamrah Bros. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921
  3. Pastene & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955
  4. W. X. Huber Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1940
  5. McKesson & Robbins (Inc.) v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API