United States v. Lippmann
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBabbeu, Judge
The undisputed facts in this case are substantially as follows:
Nine cases of merchandise arrived at New York by vessel March 6, 1920. Two days later a consumption entry therefor was filed and a consumption entry permit issued.
One of the nine cases, numbered 15488, was sent to the appraisers’ stores for examination and appraisal, and it was found by the appraiser that the contents were short 4f plus 8f dozen of metal boleros set with imitation precious stones.
The only question before us is, whether, under the facts hereinafter set forth, it was lawful for the collector to take duty on such…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. ShallusCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
- Balfour v. SullivanUnited States Circuit Court · 1883
- Maderia Embroidery Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
- United States v. ParkU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1896
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. FenstererCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
- Meadows v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
- W. X. Huber Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1940
- Abell Forwarding Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
- F. W. Woolworth Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1949
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.