Legal Opinion

Hamrah Bros. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 21, 1921No. 2104PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Yeies, Presiding Judge

This appeal concerns an importation of a single case of goods which, upon arrival at the port of New York, was sent to the public stores for examination and appraisement. The question involved is one of shortage. It appears that upon arrival at that port and before transmission to the public stores for examination and ap-praisement the attention of the law division of the collector of customs was called to the package. The following notation was made by an official of that division upon a slip attached to the invoice, which reads:

Respectfully returned to 7th Div. Law. Div. reports case…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. ShallusCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  2. American Bead Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  3. Maderia Embroidery Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
  4. Kentucky Distilleries & Warehouse Co. v. HamiltonDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1921

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Austin Chemical Company, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  2. Mills & Gibb Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  3. W. X. Huber Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1940
  4. Austin Chemical Co., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
  5. United States v. Dent, Allcroft & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API