Legal Opinion

Mills & Gibb Corp. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 11, 1925No. 2508PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraham, Presiding Judge

A case of merchandise, No. 7313, was landed but could not be found for delivery to the importer. The importer claimed a shortage as to this Clise and protested when required to pay duty at the regular rate thereon. The report of the collector is as follows:

The discharging inspectors report case 7313 was landed and not found for delivery.

*73The inspector’s report, made a part of the record, is:

M. G. 7313' — One c/s landed but not found for delivery.

The appellant assigns error, insisting that section 499 of the Tariff Act of 1922 repeals section 2921, Revised Statutes; that the word “ examination…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. ShallusCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  2. Hamrah Bros. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. H. S. Dorf & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955
  2. Wiley v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  3. McKesson & Robbins (Inc.) v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  4. United States v. Dent, Allcroft & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  5. Chicago Heights Distributing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API