State ex rel. Broderick v. District Court
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Order to show cause issued from the supreme court upon the application of relator for a writ of mandamus.
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
On the petition of the relator herein the district court of the county of Ramsey was by an order of this court required to show cause why a peremptory writ of mandamus should not issue directing it’ to enter judgment in the case of John F. Broderick v. City of St. Paul, and others, forever restraining the city from entering into the contract between the city and the company set out in the complaint in the action, and from carrying out or performing the pretended contract.
*162Upon the hearing of the order to show cause the facts were substantially conceded, and, so far as here material, they are…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Jordan v. HumphreySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- Babcock v. MurraySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Burke v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Cool v. KellySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- Broderick v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Liberty Nat. Bank of Roanoke v. BearCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1925
- Todd v. BetttngenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Sleeper v. KillionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
- John Wright & Associates, Inc. v. City of Red WingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- Pomeroy v. Hocking Valley Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.