Legal Opinion

Claughton v. Johnson

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1935No. 1851PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blume, Justice.

A petition for rehearing has been filed herein by defendants. Opportunity to answer the contentions therein was given to counsel for plaintiffs. Neither the trial court, nor this court, have been able to convince counsel for defendants that this case is entirely different from Quinlan v. St. John, 28 Wyo. 91, 201 Pac. 149, 203 Pac. 1088, the opinion in which, incidentally, was written by the same judge who acted as trial judge in the case at bar. We fear that the time is still too near when counsel, on account of their interest and their association and intimate knowledge of…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Grover Irrigation & Land Co. v. Lovella Ditch, Reservoir & Irrigation Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Canavan v. CanavanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Baker v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Fast v. WhitneyWyoming Supreme Court · 1920
  5. St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1896

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Fulton Insurance Co. v. White Motor Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1972
  2. North American Uranium, Inc. v. JohnstonWyoming Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Johnston v. VukelicWyoming Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Savage v. TOWN OF LANDER, WYO.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1957
  5. State v. UnderwoodWyoming Supreme Court · 1939

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API