Legal Opinion

Bitzer v. Bobo

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 22, 1888PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal by defendants, the administrator and heirs of Calvin Bobo, deceased, and others, from a judgment of the district court for Hen-nepin county, where the action was tried by Hicks, J.

1Opinion of the CourtDickiNson, J.

The plaintiff, the daughter of one Frank Bobo, was an infant under 16 years of age at the time of his death, in 1878. After his death, the above-named Calvin Bobo, since deceased, became her .guardian, and as such guardian he received, as is found by the court, $660 from the United States government, being arrears of pension •due to the plaintiff’s father, and which, he being dead, the plaintiff, as his infant daughter, became entitled to receive. Thereafter, in June, 1880, the guardian, as is found by the court, purchased the lot of land to which this action relates, for the sum of $820, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Oliver v. PiattSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
  2. Connihan v. ThompsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Board of Education v. DaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  2. Stitt v. Rat Portage Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  3. Spurr v. Home InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  4. Shearer v. BarnesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  5. Geo. A. Hormel Company v. First National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API