Legal Opinion
A. Belanger & Sons, Inc. v. Brisk Waterproofing Co., Inc.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided April 24, 1953No. Civ. A. No. 53-85-WPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WYZANSKI, District Judge.
In this suit for a declaratory judgment and injunction plaintiff moves for summary judgment.
In brief, plaintiff asserts that it is offering for sale a thru-wall waterproofing system, that defendant has told plaintiff and a prospective customer that the system would infringe the Larson patent No. 2,088,754 of which defendant is the exclusive licensee, but that it is so clear that plaintiff’s construction could not infringe any valid patent that plaintiff is entitled to have this Court declare its construction uses knowledge in the public domain and to have this Court…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sinclair & Carroll Co. v. Interchemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hook v. Hook & Ackerman, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
- A. L. Smith Iron Co. v. DicksonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Caterpillar Tractor Co. v. International Harvester Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
- Grant Paper Box Co. v. Russell Box Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1945
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Filtrol Corporation and Texaco, Inc. v. The Honorable Robert J. Kelleher, United States District JudgeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- Caldwell Manufacturing Co. v. Unique Balance Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1955
- Brisk Waterproofing Co., Inc. v. A. Belanger & Sons, IncCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1954
- Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. v. Sales Affiliates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
- Foster Grant Co. v. Polymer Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1960
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.