Caterpillar Tractor Co. v. International Harvester Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHENS, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from portions of a final decree of the United States District Court, rendered after the granting of a motion for judgment on the pleadings in an action for declaratory relief. 28 U.S.C. A. § 400.1 For clarity the appellant and appellee will be referred to as defendant and plaintiff respectively.
An answer was filed to the original complaint, and thereafter amendments adding other allegedly pertinent patents were made to the complaint. The amendments and original complaint were engrossed and the complaint and amendments as so engrossed were filed as…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- United States Galvanizing & Plating Equipment Corp. v. Hanson-Van Winkle-Munning Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1939
- McCarthy v. Bunker Hill & Sullivan Mining & Concentrating Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1908
- Carter Crume Co. v. American Sales Book Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western New York · 1903
- Grubbs v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Johnny R. Austad and Dorothy Austad, His Wife v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
- Treemond Co. v. Schering CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
- Wells v. Universal Pictures Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
- Alfred Hofmann, Inc. v. Knitting MacHines CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
- Hoover Equipment Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.