Legal Opinion
Brisk Waterproofing Co., Inc. v. A. Belanger & Sons, Inc
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided January 4, 1954No. 4763PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOODBURY, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff-appellee brought suit in the court below under Title 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201 and 2202 for a judgment declaring that the method of waterproofing brick walls described in its advertising circular, a copy of which it attached to its complaint as Exhibit A, did not conflict with any rights the defendant-appellant might have as the exclusive licensee under Larson’s Patent No. 2,088,754 for the waterproofing of masonry walls, and also for an injunction restraining the defendant from interfering with the plaintiff in the prosecution of its business. The defendant…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sinclair & Carroll Co. v. Interchemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Dewey & Almy Chemical Co. v. American Anode, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943
- Harries v. Air King Products Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
- Bresnick v. United States Vitamin CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- Grant Paper Box Co. v. Russell Box Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1945
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Nova Biomedical Corporation v. Willi Moller, D/b/a/ Gebruder Moller GlasblasereiCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
- Colonial Penn Group, Inc., and Bay Loan and Investment Bank v. Colonial Deposit CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- George P. Converse & Co., Inc. v. Polaroid CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1957
- International Union of Electrical, Radio and Amchine Workers, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
- Feldman v. BirgerDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1962
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.