Legal Opinion
Pram Nguyen v. City of Cleveland
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided October 11, 2000No. 99-3200PublishedCited by 630 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-Appellant, Pram Nguyen, brought three separate lawsuits against the City of Cleveland alleging that the City’s denial of his promotion bids violated Title VII because (1) the City discriminated against him on the basis of his national origin, and (2) the City retaliated against him for filing a grievance and EEOC complaints. The three lawsuits were consolidated into one, and the City moved for summary judgment on all of the failure to promote claims as well as the retaliation claim. The district court granted the City’s motion with respect to Nguyen’s…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by630 opinions
- Henry Dicarlo v. John E. Potter, Postmaster GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Mickey v. Zeidler Tool and Die Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- White v. Baxter Healthcare Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Imwalle v. Reliance Medical Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Yanowitz v. L'OREAL USA, INC.California Supreme Court · 2005
625 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.