Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1984No. 67794, (Calendar No. 2)PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevin, J.

(for reversal). The question presented is whether social security disability benefits that would not be paid to the dependents of a person injured in an automobile accident but for income lost as a result of the accident are required by § 3109(1) of the no-fault automobile liability act to be coordinated with work-loss benefits payable under the no-fault act. We would hold that coordination is required, and that social security disability payments to dependents are required to be subtracted from work-loss benefits.

*615The purpose of social security disability payments is income replacement. Such…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Weinberger v. WiesenfeldSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Mathews v. De CastroSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Califano v. JobstSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. O'Donnell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Mathis v. Interstate Motor Freight SystemMichigan Supreme Court · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Popma v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'n.Michigan Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Michigan Educational Employees Mutual Insurance v. MorrisMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Tousignant v. Allstate InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Profit v. Citizens Insurance Co. of AmericaMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Muci v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2007

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API