Thompson v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLevin, J.
(for reversal). The question presented is whether social security disability benefits that would not be paid to the dependents of a person injured in an automobile accident but for income lost as a result of the accident are required by § 3109(1) of the no-fault automobile liability act to be coordinated with work-loss benefits payable under the no-fault act. We would hold that coordination is required, and that social security disability payments to dependents are required to be subtracted from work-loss benefits.
*615The purpose of social security disability payments is income replacement. Such…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Weinberger v. WiesenfeldSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Mathews v. De CastroSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Califano v. JobstSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- O'Donnell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
- Mathis v. Interstate Motor Freight SystemMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Popma v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'n.Michigan Supreme Court · 1994
- Michigan Educational Employees Mutual Insurance v. MorrisMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- Tousignant v. Allstate InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
- Profit v. Citizens Insurance Co. of AmericaMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
- Muci v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.