Legal Opinion

Mathews v. De Castro

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 13, 1976No. 75-1197PublishedCited by 351 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stewart

Under the Social Security Act a married woman whose husband retires or becomes disabled is granted benefits if she has a minor or other dependent child in her care. A divorced woman whose former husband retires or becomes disabled does not receive such benefits. The issue in the present case is whether this difference in the statutory treatment of married and divorced women is permissible under the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

I

Section 202 (b)(1) of the Social Security Act, 49 Stat. 623, as added and amended, 42 U. S. C. § 402 (b) (1) (1970 ed. and Supp. V), provides for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Mathews v. LucasSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Jefferson v. HackneySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Helvering v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by351 opinions

  1. Cornelius v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
  2. Fullilove v. KlutznickSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Schweiker v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Califano v. JobstSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. People v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court · 2006

346 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API