Legal Opinion

Tousignant v. Allstate Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1993No. 93773, (Calendar No. 12)PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevin, J.

The question presented concerns the liability of a no-fault automobile insurer when the insured purchases a policy of no-fault automobile insurance coordinated with other health coverage. We hold that a no-fault insurer is not subject to liability for medical expense that the insured’s1 health care insurer is required, under its contract, to pay for or provide.2

i

Louise Ann Tousignant was injured in an automobile accident in July, 1987. Tousignant’s auto*304mobile was insured under a no-fault automobile policy with Allstate Insurance Company.

Tousignant’s employer provided her with health care…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. O'Donnell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Federal Kemper Insurance v. Health Insurance Administration, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1986
  3. LeBlanc v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Perez v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Thompson v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Ali Bazzi v. Sentinel Insurance CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Lake States Insurance v. WilsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Smith v. Physicians Health Plan, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Dunn v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Owens v. AUTO CLUB INSURANCE ASS'NMichigan Supreme Court · 1993

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API