Legal Opinion
State v. Matteson
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided March 21, 1973No. File 11118PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HANSON, Justice.
Defendant was convicted of unlawfully and feloniously distributing a controlled drug. The only issue on appeal is whether or not the title to Chapter 229 of the 1970 Session Laws, under which defendant was convicted, is constitutionally adequate.
Chapter 229 originated in the 1970 Session of the Legislature as Senate Bill 192. It contained five sections relating to the following title: “For AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act establishing the office of the commissioner of dangerous substances control within the office of the attorney general of the state of South Dakota to meet the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. MorganSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1891
- Miles Laboratories, Inc. v. Owl Drug Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1940
- Metropolitan Casualty Insurance v. BasfordSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
- Chapman v. South Dakota Rural Credits BoardSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1922
- Lemmon Independent School District No. 1 v. RowbothamSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
3Cited by21 opinions
- South Dakota Ass'n of Tobacco & Candy Distributors v. State Ex Rel. Department of RevenueSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. BarrSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. ShultSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. PiekkolaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. BarrSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.