Legal Opinion
State v. Barr
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided January 15, 1976No. File 11457PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOLLMAN, Justice.
Defendant was charged with the unlawful distribution of a controlled substance, lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) in violation of SDCL 39-17-88. He was found guilty by a jury and was sentenced to two years’ imprisonment in the state penitentiary.
The state’s principal witness, one Naomi Church, also known as Kathy Clark, and as “Fat Kathy,” of whom we have written in State v. Barr, 89 S.D. 280, 232 N.W.2d 257, and State v. Murphy, 89 S.D. 486, 234 N.W.2d 54, testified that she had been employed as a narcotics agent by the Pennington County, South Dakota, sheriffs office and the…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- United States v. FeolaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Rideout v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- People v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- State v. ReevesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
- State v. FlorineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Planned Parenthood, Sioux Falls Clinic v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- State v. JonesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. StoneSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. Nunez-MartinezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.