State v. Piekkola
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WINANS, Justice.
A state statute under which Defendant-Respondent had been convicted was declared by this Court to be unconstitutional. Defendant petitioned the lower court to return to him the fine and the court costs imposed on and paid out by him upon his guilty plea, this petition being filed subsequent to an order of the court setting aside Defendant’s conviction. The circuit court ordered the county treasurer to restore Defendant’s fine and costs and the State appealed. We affirm the order of the circuit court.
What at first blush would appear to be a simple matter easily resolved by…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. MeyerowitzIllinois Supreme Court · 1975
- Conway v. HumbertSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
- United States v. Jack L. Lewis, United States of America v. James L. WillozCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Mullen v. DwightSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1919
- State v. MattesonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. ClarkNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1994
- Poiroux v. RichSupreme Court of Alabama · 2014
- Ex Parte McCurleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
- Matter of Estate of ErdmannSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.