Legal Opinion

State v. Barr

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 22, 1975No. File 11574PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOYLE, Justice.

This is an appeal from a conviction on two counts of distribution of marijuana in violation of SDCL 39-17-88. We affirm.

*282The facts in this case, stated in a manner favorable to the verdict, are as follows: On August 14, 1973, a paid informant, Ms. Naomi Church (Church), made contact with the defendant, William James Barr, Jr. The defendant offered to sell Church a quantity of marijuana in the near future. The next day the defendant visited Church in the morning and again in the evening. On the latter visit, the defendant sold Church a “lid” of marijuana (approximately one…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. KietzkeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Miles Laboratories, Inc. v. Owl Drug Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1940
  3. State v. KindvallSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Busby v. ShaferSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1954
  5. State v. MattesonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. BrammerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State v. HartmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  3. State v. BunnellSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State v. MabrySupreme Court of Iowa · 1990
  5. State v. PieschkeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API