State v. Barr
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DOYLE, Justice.
This is an appeal from a conviction on two counts of distribution of marijuana in violation of SDCL 39-17-88. We affirm.
*282The facts in this case, stated in a manner favorable to the verdict, are as follows: On August 14, 1973, a paid informant, Ms. Naomi Church (Church), made contact with the defendant, William James Barr, Jr. The defendant offered to sell Church a quantity of marijuana in the near future. The next day the defendant visited Church in the morning and again in the evening. On the latter visit, the defendant sold Church a “lid” of marijuana (approximately one…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. KietzkeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1971
- Miles Laboratories, Inc. v. Owl Drug Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1940
- State v. KindvallSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1971
- Busby v. ShaferSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1954
- State v. MattesonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- State v. BrammerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. HartmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. BunnellSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. MabrySupreme Court of Iowa · 1990
- State v. PieschkeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.