Legal Opinion
Formosa Corp. v. Rogers
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 27, 1951No. Civ. 17911PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOOD (Parker), J.
The Formosa Corporation, a corporation, commenced an action against Mary Pickford Rogers and Sylvia Stanley for partition of 17.4 acres of land, upon which there were buildings and other improvements used in making motion pictures. It was alleged in the complaint that the plaintiff and the defendants owned the property as tenants in common; plaintiff owned an undivided 19/80 of the property; defendant Rogers owned an undivided 41/80 of the property; defendant Stanley owned an undivided 20/80 of the property; and that Samuel Goldwyn owned certain buildings which were upon the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sears v. RuleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Cousins Investment Co. v. Hastings Clothing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1941
- Gates v. McKinnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Williams v. KinseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- De Roulet v. MitchelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- E. J. Stern and Mabel Stern v. The Dunlap Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
- Berry v. KoehlerIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
- Butte Creek Island Ranch v. CrimCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Woolliscroft v. StarrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Worthington v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.