Legal Opinion
De Roulet v. Mitchel
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 10, 1945No. Civ. 14817PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.
From a judgment of dismissal of her action for partition plaintiff appeals.
The Facts
Appellant and respondent are sisters. As tenants in common they own a parcel of land situate at the intersection of 12th and Figueroa Streets in the city of Los Angeles, in a district devoted primarily to the automotive trade. The improvement of the realty consists of a four-story reinforcedconerete building designed and used for automobile display, sales, and service. Each party alleged that she had an estate of inheritance in the property to the extent of an undivided one-half interest in the fee as her sole…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Johnson v. OlmstedSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1882
- Jameson v. HaywardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- De Uprey v. De UpreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- Hamilton v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1925
- Williams v. Wells Fargo Bank & Union Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1943
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Warner Construction Corp. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Hoel v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. SilveiraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Horsemen's Benevolent & Protective Ass'n v. Valley Racing Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- De Bartolo v. Di BattistaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1976
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.