State v. Hermosillo
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LOPEZ, Judge.
The defendant appeals his conviction for forgery and attempted forgery, § 40A-16-9(B), and § 40A-28-l(C), N.M.S.A.1953 (2d Repl.Vol. 6). We reverse on the basis of one of the claimed errors and do not reach the merits of the others.
The state began its presentation with the testimony of the woman whose checks were forged, Margaret Benavidez. She testified that she had entered a grocery store, leaving her purse in her car and that when she returned to the car her purse was missing. She suspected three men sitting in a car parked next to hers; she questioned them but declined…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. OchoaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
- De Baca v. KahnNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1945
- State v. ZarafonetisNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
- State v. MadridNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
- State v. EasterwoodNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. VigilNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. OrgainNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1993
- State v. MaciasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. MacIasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
- Ricky G. Stallings v. Robert J. Tansy, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.