Legal Opinion
State v. Zarafonetis
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided May 8, 1970No. 412PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SPIESS, Chief Judge.
Defendant was charged and convicted of receiving and concealing stolen property [§ 40A-16-11, N.M.S.A.1953 (Repl. 6)]. He has appealed from the judgment imposing sentence. The appeal questions: (1) the sufficiency of the evidence adduced by the state to establish guilt; (2) whether certain evidence should, have been admitted at the trial; and (3) whether the court erred in refusing to give certain instructions requested by defendant.
To establish the crime charged it was incumbent upon the state to prove that the property in this case, two Victor calculators, was…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Tackett v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. LindseyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969
- State v. HinojosNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1967
- Hamilton v. DotyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
- State v. EasterwoodNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- State v. SparksNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985
- State v. LopezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
- State v. RomeroNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975
- State v. CaldwellNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. WessonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.