Legal Opinion
State v. Madrid
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided March 3, 1972No. 783PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOOD, Chief Judge.
Convicted of burglary, defendant appeals. Section 40A-16-3, N.M.S.A.1953 (Repl.Vol. 6, Supp.1971)-. The issues are: (1) circumstantial evidence; (2) cross-examination as to a specific act of misconduct; (3) failure to admonish jury when an objection was sustained; (4) instructions ; (5) closing argument of the prosecution; and (6) procedure for an enhanced sentence.
Circumstantial evidence.
The crime of burglary is complete when the defendant makes an unauthorized entry with intent to commit any felony or theft. State v. Gutierrez, 82 N.M. 578, 484 P.2d 1288…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- State v. HargroveNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
- State v. McFerranNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969
- State v. TorresNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
- State v. PaceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
- Neller v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State v. FreitasHawaii Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. CorneauNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1989
- State v. JohnsonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1984
- State v. LuceroNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
- State v. AdamsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.