Legal Opinion

De Baca v. Kahn

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided August 1, 1945No. 4891PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LUJAN, Justice.

Plaintiffs, husband and wife, commenced this action against defendant for damages for injuries sustained by the plaintiff, Cle-ofas C. de Baca, from a fall in defendant’s store alleged to have been caused by the careless and negligent maintenance of ^he floor. Defendant denied that he was negligent and pleaded the defense of contributory negligence.

The material allegations of negligence were: That the floor, as plaintiffs are informed and believe, had been oiled on the night previous to the accident and that the . surface had been left wet,. slick and slippery and in a…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Ruppert v. . Brooklyn Heights R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1897
  2. J.C. Penny Co. v. RobinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Zahniser v. Pennsylvania Torpedo Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  4. Manning v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
  5. Medler v. HenryNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Boles v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Mahoney v. JC Penney CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Southern Union Gas Co. v. Briner Rust Proofing Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Kitts v. Shop Rite Foods, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Dudley v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1948

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API